The judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization against the constitutional right to abortion has sparked a growing debate on the best ways to secure the protection of this right.
In this talk, Dr. Caruso will question a widespread idea that ‘more law’ is necessarily the best route to guarantee better protection of abortion rights. Instead, she argues that a convoluted web of rules, created by ad hoc laws and regulations, inherently poses challenges to quality abortion care. To support this argument, she developed the concept of hyper-regulation, which critically refers to a model of abortion governance that characterizes most ‘liberal’ abortion laws (i.e. abortion laws admitting abortion access beyond the strict circumstances of rape/incest, fetal defects, and risk for the pregnant woman’s life). As moderator, Dr. Cook will draw on her own extensive knowledge of abortion policies and ethics to guide the discussion and highlight Dr. Caruso's latest research findings and perspectives.
While acknowledging significant issues in abortion access across its provinces, Dr. Caruso suggests that Canada offers important lessons on how to overcome the hyper-regulation model of abortion care. By decriminalizing abortion-related offences, the 1988 Supreme Court decision in R v Morgentaler has led to the regulation of abortion within a healthcare framework. Without a federal abortion law for over three decades, Canada represents a unique model in the movement toward the normalization of abortion regulation.